Abstract
C4 photosynthesis is a complex set of leaf anatomical and biochemical adaptations that have evolved more than 60 times to boost carbon uptake compared with the ancestral C3 photosynthetic type1–3. Although C4 photosynthesis has the potential to drive faster growth rates4,5, experiments directly comparing C3 and C4 plants have not shown consistent effects1,6,7. This is problematic because differential growth is a crucial element of ecological theory8,9 explaining C4 savannah responses to global change10,11, and research to increase C3 crop productivity by introducing C4 photosynthesis12. Here, we resolve this long-standing issue by comparing growth across 382 grass species, accounting for ecological diversity and evolutionary history. C4 photosynthesis causes a 19–88% daily growth enhancement. Unexpectedly, during the critical seedling establishment stage, this enhancement is driven largely by a high ratio of leaf area to mass, rather than fast growth per unit leaf area. C4 leaves have less dense tissues, allowing more leaves to be produced for the same carbon cost. Consequently, C4 plants invest more in roots than C3 species. Our data demonstrate a general suite of functional trait divergences between C3 and C4 species, which simultaneously drive faster growth and greater investment in water and nutrient acquisition, with important ecological and agronomic implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Change institution
Buy or subscribe
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
£99.00 per year
only £8.25 per issue
Learn more
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Modeling photosynthetic resource allocation connects physiology with evolutionary environments
Article Open access 05 August 2021
Developmental and biophysical determinants of grass leaf size worldwide
Article 24 March 2021
Global climate and nutrient controls of photosynthetic capacity
Article Open access 12 April 2021
References
Christin, P.-A. & Osborne, C. P. The evolutionary ecology of C4 plants. New Phytol. 204, 765–781 (2014).
Sage, R. F., Christin, P.-A. & Edwards, E. J. The C4 plant lineages of planet Earth. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 3155–3169 (2011).
Hatch, M. D. & Slack, C. R. Photosynthesis by sugar-cane leaves. A new carboxylation reaction and the pathway of sugar formation. Biochem. J. 101, 103–111 (1966).
Monteith, J. L. Reassessment of maximum growth rates for C3 and C4 crops. Exp. Agr. 14, 1–5 (1978).
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P. & Ort, D. R. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 235–261 (2010).
Snaydon, R. W. The productivity of C3 and C4 plants: a reassessment. Funct. Ecol. 5, 321–330 (1991).
Long, S. P. in C4 Plant Biology (eds Sage, R. F. & Monson, R. K. ) Ch. 7, 215–249 (Academic, 1999).
Ehleringer, J. R. Implications of quantum yield differences on the distributions of C3 and C4 grasses. Oecologia 31, 255–267 (1978).
Ehleringer, J. R., Cerling, T. E. & Helliker, B. R. C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate. Oecologia 112, 285–299 (1997).
Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J. & DeFries, R. S. Global distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation: carbon cycle implications. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1006 (2003).
Edwards, E. J., Osborne, C. P. & Stromberg, C. A. The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science. Science 328, 587–591 (2010).
von Caemmerer, S., Quick, W. P. & Furbank, R. T. The development of C4 rice: current progress and future challenges. Science 336, 1671–1672 (2012).
Parr, C. L., Lehmann, C. E. R., Bond, W. J., Hoffmann, W. A. & Andersen, A. N. Tropical grassy biomes: misunderstood, neglected, and under threat. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 29, 205–213 (2014).
Grass Phylogeny Working Group II. New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. New Phytol. 193, 304–312 (2012).
Rees, M. et al. Partitioning the components of relative growth rate: how important is plant size variation? Am. Nat. 176, E152–E161 (2010).
Grime, J. P. et al. Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79, 259–281 (1997).
Black, C. C., Chen, T. M. & Brown, R. H. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17, 338–344 (1969).
CAS Google Scholar
Sage, R. F. & Pearcy, R. W. The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 Plants. 1. Leaf nitrogen, growth, and biomass partitioning in Chenopodium album (L) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L). Plant Physiol. 84, 954–958 (1987).
Poorter, H., Remkes, C. & Lambers, H. Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Plant Physiol. 94, 621–627 (1990).
Taylor, S. H. et al. Ecophysiological traits in C3 and C4 grasses: a phylogenetically controlled screening experiment. New Phytol. 185, 780–791 (2010).
Ghannoum, O., Von Caemmerer, S., Ziska, L. H. & Conroy, J. P. The growth response of C4 plants to rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressure: a reassessment. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 931–942 (2000).
Kiær, L. P., Weisbach, A. N. & Weiner, J. Root and shoot competition: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 101, 1298–1312 (2013).
Atkinson, R. R. L., Burrell, M. M., Osborne, C. P., Rose, K. E. & Rees, M. A non-targeted metabolomics approach to quantifying differences in root storage between fast- and slow-growing plants. New Phytol. 196, 200–211 (2012).
Ghannoum, O., Evans, J. & von Caemmerer, S. in C4 Photosynthesis and Related CO2 Concentrating Mechanisms Vol. 32 Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration (eds Raghavendra, A. S. & Sage, R. F. ) Ch. 8, 129–146 (Springer Netherlands, 2011).
Shipley, B. & Vu, T.-T. Dry matter content as a measure of dry matter concentration in plants and their parts. New Phytol. 153, 359–364 (2002).
Christin, P. A. et al. Anatomical enablers and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in grasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1381–1386 (2013).
Byott, G. S. Leaf air space systems in C3 and C4 species. New Phytol. 76, 295–299 (1976).
Stata, M. et al. Mesophyll cells of C4 plants have fewer chloroplasts than those of closely related C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 2587–2600 (2014).
Ocheltree, T. W., Nippert, J. B. & Vara Prasad, P. V. A safety vs efficiency trade-off identified in the hydraulic pathway of grass leaves is decoupled from photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and precipitation. New Phytol. 210, 97–107.
Hewitt, E. J. Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, 1966).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council grant (NE/I014322/1) awarded to C.P.O., M.R., R.P.F. and K.T. P.A.C. thanks The Royal Society for support from a University Research Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Rebecca R. L. Atkinson,Emily J. Mockford,Christopher Bennett,Pascal-Antoine Christin,Robert P. Freckleton,Ken Thompson,Mark Rees&Colin P. Osborne
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, 06520-8105, Connecticut, USA
Elizabeth L. Spriggs
Authors
- Rebecca R. L. Atkinson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emily J. Mockford
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christopher Bennett
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pascal-Antoine Christin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elizabeth L. Spriggs
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robert P. Freckleton
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ken Thompson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mark Rees
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colin P. Osborne
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Contributions
C.P.O., R.P.F., K.T. and M.R. conceived the project. R.R.L.A., R.P.F., K.T., M.R. and C.P.O. designed the experiments. R.R.L.A., E.J.M. and C.B. carried out the experiments and compiled the data. P.A.C. and E.L.S. sequenced DNA and built the phylogeny. R.R.L.A. and M.R. analysed experimental data. R.R.L.A., M.R. and C.P.O. wrote the paper. All authors interpreted the results and commented on the paper.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Colin P. Osborne.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, R., Mockford, E., Bennett, C. et al. C4 photosynthesis boosts growth by altering physiology, allocation and size. Nature Plants 2, 16038 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.38
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.38
This article is cited by
-
Role of C4 photosynthetic enzyme isoforms in C3 plants and their potential applications in improving agronomic traits in crops
- Jitender Singh
- Sampurna Garai
- Baishnab Charan Tripathy
Photosynthesis Research (2022)
-
SMRT sequencing of a full-length transcriptome reveals transcript variants involved in C18 unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism pathways at chilling temperature in Pennisetum giganteum
- Qingyuan Li
- Conglin Xiang
- Zhanchang Wang
BMC Genomics (2020)
-
One-third of the plastid genes evolved under positive selection in PACMAD grasses
- Anthony Piot
- Jan Hackel
- Guillaume Besnard
Planta (2018)
-
Carbon storage potential increases with increasing ratio of C4 to C3 grass cover and soil productivity in restored tallgrass prairies
- Brian J. Spiesman
- Herika Kummel
- Randall D. Jackson
Oecologia (2018)
